[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: free vs. non-free debate

To: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: free vs. non-free debate
From: "Scot E. Wilcoxon" <scot@wilcoxon.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 20:58:37 -0600
Old-return-path: <scot@wilcoxon.org>
Organization: self
References: <19991101094021.59632@morgana.systemy.it> <19991102005041.D1019@victis.oeil.qc.ca> <381E3E50.ED0EB4CB@cgipc.com>
Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Resent-date: 2 Nov 1999 02:59:09 -0000
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <vld4nD.A.wzC.9NlH4@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
Sender: sewilco@wilcoxon.org

> We will refuse documentation covering non-free software.

I think free documentation covering Linux use of non-free software
should be as acceptable as free documentation covering Linux use of
GNU/Qt/Java/etc software.  Feel free to segregate the docs for non-free
software so people won't be confused between categories.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Niels Kristian Bech Jensen <nkbj@image.dk>

References:
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@prosa.it>
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Guylhem Aznar <guylhemlistes@free.fr>
- Re: free vs. non-free debate
  - From: Mark Komarinski <markk@cgipc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Next by Date: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Previous by thread: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Next by thread: Re: free vs. non-free debate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread